| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
   |
Posted - 2012.10.31 01:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Geligdio Khan wrote:And finally I propose the only missions available in High Sec should be of levels 1 and 2. If you can afford a faction battleship you can afford to fly in Low and Null in a cruiser without trouble.
When I first was grinding to get into lvl 4's, there is no way I had the skills/training/ship to pull lvl 4's in a cruiser...
Just sayin', n00bs would be hurt worst with this idea.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 01:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:
If I must be all things, then the fighter must become a miner and industrialist too.
So Endeth the Lesson.
Your lesson is flawed on a very basic level. The assumption it carries within it is that the fighters *aren't* already producing etc., etc.,
We do.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 01:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:
If I must be all things, then the fighter must become a miner and industrialist too.
So Endeth the Lesson.
Your lesson is flawed on a very basic level. The assumption it carries within it is that the fighters *aren't* already producing etc., etc., We do. ALL OF YOU?? lol.
You'd be surprised.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
633
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 17:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:THIS^ right there ^
is why Local should be removed in 0.0 space.
Think of all the great emergent gameplay.
I *really* wish people would stop suggesting this - with known routes in and out (i.e.: "K" space) no local is pants-on-head stupid.
Period.
Full STOP!
The best reason (main reason) no local works in WH's is that there are *not* constant routes into or out of "WH" space.
THE defining things about WH space is the lack of local and Mass Limits.
Don't remove 50% of WH's defining characteristics!
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
635
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
NARDAC wrote:Lord Zim wrote:NARDAC wrote:Does it really? last time I checked a quarterly report, it was something under 5% of the EVE population that lives in wormholes (2% if I recall).
I think lack of local is a HUGE part of why there are so few people there. This is a hint of what would happen to low/null if they removed local from there. Negatives: no local, absolute **** logistics Positives: spews isk And yet, the "spews ISK" is not getting more than an itsy/bitsy number of people moving in. I'd add the respawn rate of sites to the negatives. Everywhere else, there is always something to do. Get too many people in a WH, too active, and you can pretty easily run out of stuff to do.
Forgive the digression, but I couldn't let this pass.
Eve Fanfest presentation on the economy
Interesting part (relative to this thread) starts @ 3:00, distribution of players q1 2011 to q1 2012. "We are, in Eve, in the Law of Large Numbers - all changes will be gradual and small".
Next part (of interest) is where players >5m skill points are starts about 4:00.
As far as wormholes go, rolling wormholes to get a new transit system is fairly easy - and if you have a decent group of people can be done quickly, so "running out of things to do" is not really an issue.
The other interesting point is that the number of players above 5M skillpoints who are in WH's are players who (without WH's) - might have ended up in 0.0 space, but, for whatever reason, don't want to live there.
Don't write off wormholes so easily - you get out of it what you put into it...
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
635
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Look I can understand some of you nullsec guys don't like the idea of no local because you won't have an instant intel tool. Even you lowsec guys won't see that local spike coming to bust up your camp so you can dock in your orca and hide in high sec.
So here's some advice for you guys.
1. Don't undock in anything you can't afford to lose.
2. Always stay aligned.
3. Learn to fit for PVP. Use your lows and mids for actual tank, warp stabs, and such other related modules instead of just fitting for maximum gank.
4. Get a scout alt to monitor adjacent systems.
5. Mash the D-Scan until your finger falls off.
These methods work in highsec. I know this because this is something like the same list I have seen handed from null and lowsec uber leet superhuman PVPers to people in highsec. So it MUST be good, right?
Oh and if you don't like your own medicine: >>>>>> WOW >>>>>>>
Local is pants on head stupid for null sec.
static travel routes and bookmarks make a "no local for null-sec" stupid in the extreme because all it will do is encourage the use of "gate watching alts".
Thats it.
It will not fix anything and in fact will make things worse.
Also: I don't live in null sec - I live in WH's, just to avoid that line of thought.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
635
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 00:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Andski wrote:In my opinion, wormholes suck up a lot of talented players whose skills would otherwise be useful to newer organizations looking to move into nullsec. But that's another thread.
Yes we do.
You're welcome!
:P
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
635
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 00:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Don't write off wormholes so easily - you get out of it what you put into it... I'm certainly not writing off WHs, I'm just pointing out the negatives, and if I weren't lazy enough to go to hisec to make money instead of ratting or whatever in nullsec, if local were removed I would've either moved to hisec or just say **** it and move to WHs, where the rewards are at least scaled up to match the effort and risk.
Quote fail?
I aimed that one at Touval (or whatever his name is).
<------- sicker'n hell with the creeping chest crud today.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
636
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 22:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:You're underestimating the power of wardec system+bounty+crimewatch under Concord applauds
No, they aren't.
Bounties won't do any good, and as far as I can tell, Crimewatch 2.0 is *not* going to encourage pvp.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
| |
|